<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results Indicate That I Am David Eddings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/</link>
	<description>Raving Madly On the Tubes of Doom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:46:42 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terje</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2336</link>
		<dc:creator>Terje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2336</guid>
		<description>I got Michael Moorcock (5 High-Brow, 5 Violent, -1 Experimental and 29 Cynical).

Which is all right, I guess. I thought Elric was a bit dull at times, but it was generally quite fascinating, especially the world building. Glorianna was... not exactly *fun*, you know, but... hmm. Perhaps &quot;interesting&quot; is a diffuse enough word to use? Of course they both failed to deliver what they promised.

And the fun thing is, every one of these kinda make sense, when applied to me. :P

As for Ursula LeGuin, I&#039;m diappointed they failed to mention her The Dispossessed, one of the best sci-fi novels I&#039;ve read. Both the high-brow and the experimental ratings of that one ought to be much higher that what Earthsea earned her, but I guess that&#039;s sci-fi for you. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got Michael Moorcock (5 High-Brow, 5 Violent, -1 Experimental and 29 Cynical).</p>
<p>Which is all right, I guess. I thought Elric was a bit dull at times, but it was generally quite fascinating, especially the world building. Glorianna was&#8230; not exactly *fun*, you know, but&#8230; hmm. Perhaps &#8220;interesting&#8221; is a diffuse enough word to use? Of course they both failed to deliver what they promised.</p>
<p>And the fun thing is, every one of these kinda make sense, when applied to me. <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for Ursula LeGuin, I&#8217;m diappointed they failed to mention her The Dispossessed, one of the best sci-fi novels I&#8217;ve read. Both the high-brow and the experimental ratings of that one ought to be much higher that what Earthsea earned her, but I guess that&#8217;s sci-fi for you. <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stjernesøkeren</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stjernesøkeren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>I LOVE Eddings, but I&#039;m also rather pleased with my result, scarily spot on considering my likes/dislikes :)

Philip Pullman (b.1946)

3 High-Brow, -3 Violent, 13 Experimental and 17 Cynical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE Eddings, but I&#8217;m also rather pleased with my result, scarily spot on considering my likes/dislikes <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Philip Pullman (b.1946)</p>
<p>3 High-Brow, -3 Violent, 13 Experimental and 17 Cynical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>(Which would likely also make Gene Wolfe a poor choice)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Which would likely also make Gene Wolfe a poor choice)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Erikson&#039;s first book is vastly inferior to his second and third, if my experience is anything to judge by. But it is his exact &quot;throw you head first into plot, setting, cast and world&quot;-approach I figured you&#039;d like, so he might not be for you after all, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erikson&#8217;s first book is vastly inferior to his second and third, if my experience is anything to judge by. But it is his exact &#8220;throw you head first into plot, setting, cast and world&#8221;-approach I figured you&#8217;d like, so he might not be for you after all, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirgaal</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirgaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>I did give  Steven Erikson&#039;s Malazan series a go a year back. However, I couldn&#039;t quite get into it, and yielded after a few chapters. I&#039;m not entirely sure what the problem was, but I just didn&#039;t get a feel for the Malazan universe.
 It might be because it felt like I had started reading in the middle of an ongoing story, and was thus hurled into a world that I could not adapt to.
I suppose I would feel differently if I had kept on reading. I did after all read the A Game of Thrones prologue a dozen times before managing to read on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did give  Steven Erikson&#8217;s Malazan series a go a year back. However, I couldn&#8217;t quite get into it, and yielded after a few chapters. I&#8217;m not entirely sure what the problem was, but I just didn&#8217;t get a feel for the Malazan universe.<br />
 It might be because it felt like I had started reading in the middle of an ongoing story, and was thus hurled into a world that I could not adapt to.<br />
I suppose I would feel differently if I had kept on reading. I did after all read the A Game of Thrones prologue a dozen times before managing to read on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>Gene Wolfe is HEAVY, be warned. But it&#039;s sort of that heaviness that should appeal to you - I mean, you scored 19 High Brow and 29 Experimental, for crying out loud.
Have you read any Steven Erikson? Well, Wolfe is sort of heavy like he is (meaning the contrived way he does exposition, for instance), only with a strong feel of Ancient to it that makes it read as really bloody old stuff. And which of course makes it even heavier. *Hopes this sort of made sense* Anyway, you like Heavy Shows like The Wire and The Sopranos, which might not be AS heavy as really heavy books, but still as close to that type of literature as TV has ever gotten. So you might easily enjoy it. Or you might easily find it boring beyond belief. What the heck do I know. ;)

Le Guin, I know very well who she is, she&#039;s the woman with the famous Earthsea-books, but I only read one of those books once, back in eight grade. Remember very little of it now. It was a little too slow-paced for me back then, and the library had lost book number two to some water damage, so I never kept going. I&#039;ve had a professor in English Literature a couple of years back, though, who told me I should try her out again. So I might, some day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene Wolfe is HEAVY, be warned. But it&#8217;s sort of that heaviness that should appeal to you &#8211; I mean, you scored 19 High Brow and 29 Experimental, for crying out loud.<br />
Have you read any Steven Erikson? Well, Wolfe is sort of heavy like he is (meaning the contrived way he does exposition, for instance), only with a strong feel of Ancient to it that makes it read as really bloody old stuff. And which of course makes it even heavier. *Hopes this sort of made sense* Anyway, you like Heavy Shows like The Wire and The Sopranos, which might not be AS heavy as really heavy books, but still as close to that type of literature as TV has ever gotten. So you might easily enjoy it. Or you might easily find it boring beyond belief. What the heck do I know. <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Le Guin, I know very well who she is, she&#8217;s the woman with the famous Earthsea-books, but I only read one of those books once, back in eight grade. Remember very little of it now. It was a little too slow-paced for me back then, and the library had lost book number two to some water damage, so I never kept going. I&#8217;ve had a professor in English Literature a couple of years back, though, who told me I should try her out again. So I might, some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirgaal</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirgaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say I have heard of Gene Wolfe either, though I kind of have a feeling I should. But I&#039;ll hopefully remember to check both of them out next time I&#039;m looking for something to read.

I am a wee bit disturbed by  my high score in the experimental catagory. Probably because when I read &quot;experimental&quot; I automatically think &quot;sexually ambigious&quot;. :P

So, Ursula K Le Guin  huh? Never heard of her either (my ignorance astounds even me). Are you familiar with her work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say I have heard of Gene Wolfe either, though I kind of have a feeling I should. But I&#8217;ll hopefully remember to check both of them out next time I&#8217;m looking for something to read.</p>
<p>I am a wee bit disturbed by  my high score in the experimental catagory. Probably because when I read &#8220;experimental&#8221; I automatically think &#8220;sexually ambigious&#8221;. <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, Ursula K Le Guin  huh? Never heard of her either (my ignorance astounds even me). Are you familiar with her work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loki</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>Never heard of her either. The comparison to Gene Wolfe, though, combined with what I know of your TV-tastes and your scores in the four categories, makes me think it could probably be worthwhile for you to check her out. And if for no other reason - &quot;exact opposite of J. K. Rowling&quot; is quite the high praise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of her either. The comparison to Gene Wolfe, though, combined with what I know of your TV-tastes and your scores in the four categories, makes me think it could probably be worthwhile for you to check her out. And if for no other reason &#8211; &#8220;exact opposite of J. K. Rowling&#8221; is quite the high praise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirgaal</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirgaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>Mary Gentle (b. 1956)
19 High-Brow, 9 Violent, 29 Experimental and 17 Cynical!



Congratulations! You are High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below.

Mary Gentle is a UK author whose work has received some acclaim. Her great break-through came with 1984 fantasy novel Golden Witchbreed, which depicts the travels of a UK envoy on a planet, Orthe, where the inhabitants have, by choice, abandoned a high-tech society for a seemingly less advanced way of life. Though nominally science fiction, the novel is generally called fantasy, partly because Orthe has the feel of a fantasy world. Nothing is what it first seems to be on Orthe, however, and the envoy&#039;s journey across the planet gradually reveals a vividly imagined alternate society, where nothing is ever over-simplified or, for that matter, easy. Gentle revisited Orthe in 1987, when the sequel Ancient Light was published.

Since then Gentle has written the White Crow sequence, starting with Rats and Gargoyles (1990), which has received some acclaim, not least from other writers; China Miéville, for example, put it on his list of &quot;50 science fiction and fantasy novels socialists should read&quot;. She has also written Grunts! (1992), a novel set in a Tolkien-like fantasy world, but told from the point of view of the orcs, as well as several other books.

Gentle is not one to shun away from difficult issues in her works and is equally unafraid of discussing and depicting violence. Neither has she settled to writing the same kind of story over and over, and, while being at her best a great entertainer, she has the ability of twisting and bending fantasy environments and themes at her will, making unafraid a key-word of her career as a writer.

You are also a lot like Gene Wolfe.

If you want something more gentle (no pun intended), try Philip Pullman.

If you&#039;d like a challenge, try your exact opposite, J K Rowling.

Hm, have never even heard of her. Oh well, I never take these kind of tests seriously anyway. I quite enjoy taking them though. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary Gentle (b. 1956)<br />
19 High-Brow, 9 Violent, 29 Experimental and 17 Cynical!</p>
<p>Congratulations! You are High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below.</p>
<p>Mary Gentle is a UK author whose work has received some acclaim. Her great break-through came with 1984 fantasy novel Golden Witchbreed, which depicts the travels of a UK envoy on a planet, Orthe, where the inhabitants have, by choice, abandoned a high-tech society for a seemingly less advanced way of life. Though nominally science fiction, the novel is generally called fantasy, partly because Orthe has the feel of a fantasy world. Nothing is what it first seems to be on Orthe, however, and the envoy&#8217;s journey across the planet gradually reveals a vividly imagined alternate society, where nothing is ever over-simplified or, for that matter, easy. Gentle revisited Orthe in 1987, when the sequel Ancient Light was published.</p>
<p>Since then Gentle has written the White Crow sequence, starting with Rats and Gargoyles (1990), which has received some acclaim, not least from other writers; China Miéville, for example, put it on his list of &#8220;50 science fiction and fantasy novels socialists should read&#8221;. She has also written Grunts! (1992), a novel set in a Tolkien-like fantasy world, but told from the point of view of the orcs, as well as several other books.</p>
<p>Gentle is not one to shun away from difficult issues in her works and is equally unafraid of discussing and depicting violence. Neither has she settled to writing the same kind of story over and over, and, while being at her best a great entertainer, she has the ability of twisting and bending fantasy environments and themes at her will, making unafraid a key-word of her career as a writer.</p>
<p>You are also a lot like Gene Wolfe.</p>
<p>If you want something more gentle (no pun intended), try Philip Pullman.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like a challenge, try your exact opposite, J K Rowling.</p>
<p>Hm, have never even heard of her. Oh well, I never take these kind of tests seriously anyway. I quite enjoy taking them though. <img src='http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sauegjeteren</title>
		<link>http://theredundantblog.natsecorma.net/2009/06/10/results-indicate-that-i-am-david-eddings/comment-page-1/#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>sauegjeteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natsecorma.net/theredundantblog/?p=467#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>A bit disappointing, really. I always thougt I clearly was a cynic. This is just a little bit cynic. Oh well, I&#039;m high brow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit disappointing, really. I always thougt I clearly was a cynic. This is just a little bit cynic. Oh well, I&#8217;m high brow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
